Four cases from everyday business
Not everything made with AI has to be labelled. In a company’s everyday work, these four cases matter most:
| Case | Label it? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Chatbot or AI phone assistant on your website | yes | Customers must know they are talking to an AI. |
| AI image for your advertising, recognisably designed | usually not | It does not pretend to show anything real; a voluntary note builds trust. |
| Texts about your offer, checked by you | usually not | The duty only applies to texts on matters of public interest that no person with editorial responsibility has checked. |
| Deceptively real image, video or voice of a person | yes | That is a deepfake and has to be disclosed. |
Whether the AI on your website is already labelled correctly is shown by the website check; it is free.
The rules are set out in Article 50(1) of the AI Act and the following paragraphs of the Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act, AI Act) and apply since 2 August 2026. This page explains them in plain words and does not replace legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer or your data protection officer.
Who has to label what
The regulation distinguishes two roles. Providers develop an AI system or have it developed and place it on the market or put it into service under their own name or brand. Deployers use an AI system in their business, for example as a chatbot on their own website. If you use someone else’s system, you are usually a deployer; depending on development and provision, provider obligations can arise as well.
| Provision | Who | What |
|---|---|---|
| Article 50(1) of the AI Act | Provider | Build AI systems that talk directly to people so that people learn about it, unless it is obvious |
| Article 50(2) of the AI Act | Provider | Mark images, videos, audio and text from generative AI in a machine-readable way, as far as technically feasible |
| Article 50(3) of the AI Act | Deployer | Inform people when emotion recognition or biometric categorisation is used |
| Article 50(4) of the AI Act | Deployer | Disclose deepfakes; disclose AI texts published to inform the public on matters of public interest |
Under Article 50(5) of the AI Act, the notice must come at the latest at the first interaction or first exposure to the content, clearly recognisable and accessible.
What applies from when
| What | From when |
|---|---|
| Obligations under Article 50, in principle | since 2 August 2026 |
| Machine-readable marking for AI systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026 | by 2 December 2026 |
The transition period came with Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI). According to the European Commission’s questions and answers, it only applies to marking by providers and only to older systems.
For the other obligations, such as the notice in the chat or the disclosure of a deepfake, there is no postponement. Content created before the cut-off date does not have to be labelled retroactively, according to the Commission.
Chatbots and AI agents on your website
A chatbot or AI agent talks directly to people. Article 50(1) of the AI Act applies to that. In practice this means:
- Notice in the first sentence: the first message says that an AI is writing, for example “You are chatting with an AI”.
- Honest when asked: if someone asks “Are you a person?”, the answer is no.
- No human appearance: a name is allowed; a made-up photo with an employee’s CV is misleading.
- On the phone and by email too: the duty does not depend on the channel, but on a person interacting with the AI.
The first message could look like this:
“Hello, this is the digital assistant, an AI. Happy to help; if needed, I’ll pass your request on to a person.”
By its wording, the duty falls on the provider. As a deployer you should still check that the notice actually appears in your setup. What a good tone sounds like is on the page Tone in AI customer service; what data protection requires is on the page AI and the GDPR.
Images, videos and voices
Under Article 3(60) of the AI Act, a deepfake is AI-generated or manipulated image, audio or video content that resembles existing persons, objects, places, entities or events and would falsely appear to be authentic. Only for that does disclosure under Article 50(4) of the AI Act apply.
- Deepfake: an AI video in which your managing director says something they never said has to be disclosed.
- Art, satire, fiction: for evidently artistic or satirical works, a notice that does not spoil the enjoyment of the work is enough.
- Illustration without deception: a recognisably drawn or designed AI illustration does not resemble a real scene it pretends to show. It is usually not a deepfake. A voluntary note still builds trust.
- Photorealistic people: an AI image of a fictional person that looks like a real customer photo should be labelled.
Texts: only in one narrow case
For AI texts, Article 50(4) of the AI Act only applies when three conditions come together:
- Published: the text is public, not just internal.
- To inform the public: it is meant to inform, like a news item.
- Public interest: it concerns a matter of public interest.
Even then, the duty does not apply if a person has reviewed the text for content and someone holds editorial responsibility.
Correcting spelling is not enough for that, according to the Commission. Product texts, blog posts about your offer or replies to customers are usually not covered by this rule. For chats, the rule for conversations with an AI applies instead.
Social media
02.08.2026 Labelling duty applies since
Source: eur-lex.europa.eu · As of: 12 Jul 2024
The AI Act has no separate rule for social media. The same cases apply: a deepfake in a post has to be disclosed, and so does an AI text on a matter of public interest without human review. An advertising image designed with AI that does not pretend to show anything real is usually not covered.
Code of practice and fines
8 July 2026
On 8 July 2026, the European Commission found that the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content adequately covers the obligations under Article 50(2), (4) and (5). Anyone who signs the code and implements its measures can use this to show that they meet the obligations; it is not conclusive proof. Signing is voluntary.
Anyone who breaches Article 50 risks fines under Article 99(4) of the regulation of up to EUR 15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover (whichever is higher).
For small and medium-sized enterprises, Article 99(6) applies the lower of the two amounts.
Checklist for your website
- Chat and phone: does your chatbot or phone assistant say in the first sentence that it is an AI?
- Images: are there photorealistic AI images of real or fictional people that look real? Then label them.
- Videos and voices: are there AI videos or AI voices that imitate a real person? Then disclose them.
- Texts: do you publish AI texts on matters of public interest without human review? Then label them or have people review them for content, with editorial responsibility for publication.
- Records: write down who checks which content and how you label it.
- For agencies and client projects: decide per project who implements the notice, who checks it after changes and who records it.
Your next step
Read in full
Whether AI used on your website is labelled is shown by the website check; it is free. We talk about your case in a first call of 30 minutes. Get in touch
What could AI take off your plate?
In a first call (30 minutes) we look at your work and tell you openly what is worth it and what is not.
Frequently asked questions.
Since when does the AI labelling duty apply?
Since 2 August 2026. Only providers of AI systems that were already on the market before have until 2 December 2026 for machine-readable marking.
Do I have to label a chatbot on my website?
As a rule, yes. Anyone chatting with an AI must learn about it, unless it is obvious. A clear notice in the first message is usually enough.
Do I have to label AI images?
If they are deepfakes, yes: they resemble real people, places or events and falsely appear authentic. A recognisably designed illustration is usually not a deepfake. For photorealistic images of people, a notice is the safe way.
Do I have to label AI texts?
Only in one narrow case: the text is published, is meant to inform the public on a matter of public interest and has not been reviewed by a person with editorial responsibility.
Does the labelling duty also apply to social media?
Yes, with the same rules as on the website. The AI Act contains no separate rule for social media.
What happens if I do not label?
A fine of up to EUR 15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover (whichever is higher) under Article 99(4) of the AI Act. For small and medium-sized enterprises, the lower of the two amounts applies.
Is this page legal advice?
No, this page is not legal advice. It explains the rules in general and names the provisions; for your individual case, ask a lawyer or your data protection officer.
How is your website doing?
The check is free and without obligation. You get the report by email.
Sources.
- EUR-Lex: EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), Art. 3(60), Art. 50, Art. 99, Art. 111 and Art. 113Vendor / primary · As of
- European Commission AI Act Service Desk: Article 50 and Article 111 (as amended by the Digital Omnibus)Vendor / primary · As of
All 4 sources
- European Commission: questions and answers on the transparency obligations under Article 50Vendor / primary · As of
- European Commission: opinion on the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated ContentVendor / primary · As of
- EU AI Act, Article 3(60), Article 50, Article 99, Article 111 and Article 113: eur-lex.europa.eu
- European Commission AI Act Service Desk, Article 111 as amended by the Digital Omnibus: ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu
- European Commission, questions and answers on the transparency obligations under Article 50: digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
- European Commission, opinion on the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content: digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu



